CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Hughey KFD, Kerr GN, Cullen R. Transp. Res. D Trans. Environ. 2011; 16(8): 575-578. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Publishing) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
unavailable |
|
Abstract |
Based on a public survey of registered voters, we explore four options for internalising the social and environmental costs of road transport. The options were presented together with generalised factual information about their benefits and costs. Respondents are highly supportive of fuel use efficiency standards and exhaust gas quality standards, with lesser support for proposed initiatives of road user charges and speed reduction. Demographic analysis of responses enables identification of those who might favour or oppose particular options. In this case women are identified as being strongly supportive of the speed reduction option. |