Citation

Kenney WL. Int. J. Ind. Ergonomics 1988; 3(2): 115-120.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1988, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Two calculations of the coefficient for vapor permeation efficiency (Fpcl) have been proposed for use in the rational (heat balance) approach to heat stress problems caused by wearing protective clothing--one proposed by Candas et al. (1987) and a second (derived from Ke[eta]') proposed by Kenney et al. (1987). Both of these coefficients are based on the concept of sweating efficiency and each is used in the calculation of Emax, the maximal evaporative capacity of the environment. This paper compares these 2 approaches based on data collected across several clothing ensembles common to industry. In general, the lighter and more permeable the ensemble, the closer the agreement between the two coefficients. However, as clothing becomes impermeable (e.g., vapor-barrier clothing made of plastic, coated Tyvek(R), etc.), use of the former Fpcl significantly overestimates Emax. It is suggested that either calculation can be used for lightweight clothing (although Candas Fpcl is simpler to calculate) but that the Fpcl calculated by Kenney and co-workers is preferable for heavier ensembles.