Citation

Craib I. Sociol. Rev. 1987; 35(4): 721-743.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1987, The Editorial Board of The Sociological Review, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-954X.1987.tb00563.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The problems with established sociological and socio‐psychological conceptions of masculinity are discussed, and it is argued that object‐relations theory can provide a clearer understanding of masculinity. An ideal type of the development of masculinity is built up in contrast to similar ideal types of human development and the development of femininity as portrayed by recent feminist writers. The status of the ideal type is then discussed, drawing out its implications for the relationship between psychoanalysis and sociological analysis, and for the nature of social change.