Citation

Krieken R. Sociol. Rev. 1989; 37(2): 193-218.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1989, The Editorial Board of The Sociological Review, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-954X.1989.tb00027.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Norbert Elias's writings on the development of self‐constraint and its relationship to state formation are examined in the light of anthropological and historical critiques of his arguments and data. It is argued that state formation should not be seen as essential to self‐discipline; that Elias's view of the development of self‐constraint rests on a limited reading of the historical evidence on medieval personality and behaviour; and that many other aspects of the history of European society apart from 'lengthening chains of interdependency', such as bureaucracy and individuality, should be examined in order to explain modern self‐discipline.