Citation

McAlinden A. Crime Prev. Community Safety 1999; 1(1): 41-53.

Affiliation

Institute of Criminology and Criminal Justice, The Queen's University of Belfast

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group -- Palgrave-Macmillan)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

'Megan's Law' in the United States and Part 1 of the Sex Offenders Act 1997 in the United Kingdom, make provision for the creation of a register which will record the names and addresses of all persons convicted of or cautioned for a sexual offence. Arguments expounded in favour of the legislation include the supposedly high recidivism among sex offenders, the inadequacy of supervision provisions, and the resulting need to 'track' the dangerous offender for public protection. In practice, however, there is a plethora of obstacles, such as cost and inadequate policing resources, which may impede its effectiveness in aiding law enforcement and reduce it to symbolic significance only. In addition, there is an array of ethical objections to the legislation, such as that it breaches civil liberties and constitutes 'double jeopardy', which may prevent meaningful imposition.