SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Dockrell S, Johnson M, Ganly J, Bennett K. Work 2011; 40(2): 165-172.

Affiliation

Department of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, IOS Press)

DOI

10.3233/WOR-2011-1217

PMID

21876271

Abstract

Manual handling (MH) incidents may result in injury, absenteeism and/or compensation claim. Objective: This study investigated the factors associated with MH incidents among healthcare workers who had made a claim, and the management and outcome of those workers. Participants: A national sample of healthcare sector MH incident claim files (n=247) were accessed and 35~files met the inclusion criteria. Methods: Data were collected and presented graphically or descriptively using percentages (and 95% Confidence intervals, CI). Chi-square (χ ^{2}) tests were used for comparing proportions between groups. SPSS (v14.0) was used for analysis. Significance at p<0.05 is assumed. Results: Attendants accounted for the highest number of claimants. The majority of claims (74%, 95% CI 68%, 81%) were for back injury; 11% (8%, 15%) for neck injury. Fifty-one percent (43%, 60%) involved patient-handling tasks at the time of incident; 46% (37%, 54%) involved inanimate handling. Ninety-one percent (89%, 94%) took sick leave, with 52% (43%, 60%) taking > 52 weeks. Only 58% (49%, 65%) returned to work. Claimants who had been in communication with employers were significantly more likely to return to work than those who did not (χ ^{2} test, p=0.017). Conclusions: Improved management of MH incidents and injured workers are recommended.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print