Citation

Pinch T. Camb. J. Econ. 2010; 34(1): 77-89.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Cambridge Political Economy Society, Publisher Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/cje/bep044

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Using the author's own experiences in local politics, the paper examines several cases in which pieces of mundane infrastructure are contested. The cases include eruvs, traffic-calming technologies, and invisible dog fences. The argument is that in contra distinction to abstract philosophical approaches to technology, the social construction of technology (SCOT) needs to return to the examination of the mundane embeddedness of technologies in everyday life. It is argued that an adequate approach to the role of the human and the non-human should not buy into a distinction between ontology and epistemology but instead should focus upon the contested interaction of humans and non-humans in everyday life and thereby restore the analysis of intentionality and meaning to its rightful place at the core of the sociology of technology.