Citation

Butterfield P, Hill W, Postma J, Butterfield P, Odom-Maryon T. Am. J. Public Health 2011; 101(Suppl 1): S262-70.

Affiliation

Washington State University.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, American Public Health Association)

DOI

10.2105/AJPH.2011.300164

PMID

21836117

Abstract

Objectives. Parents need meaningful and actionable information if they are to reduce household environmental health risks to their children. To address this issue, we tested the effectiveness of a multi-risk social/cognitive intervention on rural low income parents' 1) environmental health self-efficacy and 2) stage of environmental health precautionary adoption. Methods. Biomarker (lead, cotinine) and household samples (carbon monoxide, radon, mold/mildew, and drinking water contaminants) were collected from 235 families (399 adults, 441 children) in Montana and Washington states. Families were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups; intervention families received 4 visits from public health nurses who provided tailored information and guidance to parents; controls received usual and customary public health services. Results. At 3 months, the intervention group had significantly higher scores on (1) all 6 risk-specific self-efficacy subscales (P<.01), (2) general environmental health self-efficacy (P<.001), (3) 5 of 6 risk-specific precaution adoption subscales (P<.05), and (4) general environmental health precaution adoption (P<.001). Conclusions. The intervention yielded significant improvements in both outcomes. This evidence supported the need for a policy discussion addressing the added value that broad-based public health nurse interventions might bring to children's environmental health.

Language: en