Citation

O'Connell Davidson J. Crit. Soc. Policy 2011; 31(3): 454-477.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0261018311405014

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article aims to contribute to the growing body of scholarly work that critically deconstructs dominant discourse on 'trafficking' and to the literature that documents and theorizes the gap between states' spoken commitment to children's rights and the lived experience of migrant children in the contemporary world. It contrasts the intense public and policy concern with the suffering of 'trafficked' children against the relative lack of interest in other ways that migrant children can suffer, in particular, suffering resulting from immigration policy and its enforcement. It argues that discourse on 'child trafficking' operates to produce and maintain exclusionary conceptions of who is normatively a child. These conceptions of the normative child then inform policy and practice that often punishes, rather than protects, children who do not conform to the imagined norm, and that simultaneously reinforces children's existing vulnerabilities and creates new ones.

Keywords: Human trafficking