Citation

Juneau CE, Jones CM, McQueen DV, Potvin L. Glob. Health Promot. 2011; 18(1): 79-89, 122-33, 157-68.

Affiliation

Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, International Union for Health Promotion and Education, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

21721308

Abstract

There is much debate around the use of evidence in health promotion practice. This article aims to sharpen our understanding of this matter by reviewing and analyzing the 26 case studies presented in this special issue. These case studies suggest that health promotion practitioners are using a wide range of research evidence in interventions for high-risk individuals, entire populations, and vulnerable groups according to all five strategies for action described in the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. In nearly every case, practitioners had to mediate and adapt research evidence for their case. Eight key levers helped practitioners embed research evidence into practice: local and cultural relevance of the evidence, community capacity-building, sustained dialogue from the outset with all stakeholders, established academic-supported partnerships, communication that responds to organizational and political readiness, acknowledgement and awareness of gaps between evidence and practice, advocacy, and adequate earmarked resources. These case studies provide some evidence that there is an evidence-based health promotion, that this evidence base is broad, and that practitioners use different strategies to adapt it for their case.

Language: es