Citation

Olivan-Gonzalvo G. Gac. Sanit. 2004; 18(5): 380-386.

Vernacular Title

Comparacion entre los ninos de etnia gitana e inmigrantes extranjeros ingresados

Affiliation

Servicio de Pediatria y Adolescencia. Instituto Aragones de Servicios Sociales. Gobierno de Aragon. Zaragoza. Espana.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

15498408

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether there are differences between Spanish gypsy and foreign immigrant children admitted to protection centers in the characteristics of the maltreatment, social and familial factors linked to maltreatment, and health status. Methods: The social and health reports of 83 Spanish gypsy and 105 foreign immigrant children admitted to protection centers of the Aragonese Institute for Social Services (Instituto Aragones de Servicios Sociales IASS) because of maltreatment from January 1994 to December 2003 were reviewed. Maltreatment, its types, and warning signs were defined and assessed according to the guidelines drawn up by the IASS. The social and familial risk factors associated with maltreatment were determined according to national studies. Health status was assessed following protocols used by the IASS. A descriptive and comparative statistical study was performed. Results: The Spanish gypsy children were mostly in the age group of 0-5 years, while foreign immigrants were mostly in the age group of 12-17 years. Spanish gypsy children showed a greater frequency of physical and emotional neglect and/or abandonment (p < 0.001) and were more likely to have families with problems of crime (odds ratio OR = 16.5; 95% confidence interval 95%CI, 6.7-40.7), drug/alcohol abuse (OR = 8.8; 95%CI, 3.7-21) and families with more than one social and health risk factor (OR = 9.3; 95%CI, 3.8-22.8). Spanish gypsy children showed a greater frequency of neurological disorders, disabling diseases, absent or incomplete immunizations, and dermatologic diseases. Foreign immigrant children showed a greater frequency of physical and psychological and/or sexual abuse (p < 0.001) and were more likely to live in a single parent family (OR = 7.9; 95%CI, 2.2-27.7). Conclusions: Identifying the differences between these two groups of maltreated children could be useful for professionals working in the community social services in charge of developing intervention strategies for the prevention and early detection of maltreatment, as well as for professionals in charge of the health of these children during their stay in a protection center.

Language: es