SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Tams J, van Loon JP, Rozema FR, Otten E, Bos RR. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1996; 34(5): 400-405.

Affiliation

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8909730

Abstract

The loads across the fracture depend on variables such as position of the fracture and the bite point. Up to now, no study has described systematically the influence of these two variables on these loads. The aim of this study was to describe and compare value and direction of the loads across the fracture for different positions of fractures in the mandible. In a three-dimensional model, bending and torsion moments and shear forces were compared for five mandibular fractures. The fractures were located in, respectively, the angle, posterior body, anterior body, canine and symphysis region. Positive bending moments were defined to give compression at the border, negative bending moments to give compression at the alveolar side of the mandible. The angle and posterior body fracture have high positive bending moments, small torsion moments and high shear forces. The anterior body, canine and symphysis fracture have high negative bending moments and high torsion moments with similar maximum values. The number of bite points with negative bending moments were different for all fractures. These bite points were always located on the fractured side. It is concluded that mandibular fractures can be divided roughly into two groups with similar load patterns across the fracture. One group consists of angle and posterior body fractures, the other group consists of anterior body, canine and symphysis fractures.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print