Citation

Gleaves DH. Psychol. Bull. 1996; 120(1): 42-59.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4235, USA. dhg@psyc.tamu.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8711016

Abstract

According to the sociocognitive model of dissociative identity disorder (DID; formerly, multiple personality disorder), DID is not a valid psychiatric disorder of posttraumatic origin; rather, it is a creation of psychotherapy and the media. Support for the model was recently presented by N.P. Spanos (1994). In this article, the author reexamines the evidence for the model and concludes that it is based on numerous false assumptions about the psychopathology, assessment, and treatment of DID. Most recent research on the dissociative disorders does not support (and in fact disconfirms) the sociocognitive model, and many inferences drawn from previous research appear unwarranted. No reason exists to doubt the connection between DID and childhood trauma. Treatment recommendations that follow from the sociocognitive model may be harmful because they involve ignoring the posttraumatic symptomatology of persons with DID.

Language: en