Citation

Pashler H. Psychol. Bull. 1994; 116(2): 220-244.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology 0109, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1994, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220

PMID

7972591

Abstract

People often have trouble performing 2 relatively simple tasks concurrently. The causes of this interference and its implications for the nature of attentional limitations have been controversial for 40 years, but recent experimental findings are beginning to provide some answers. Studies of the psychological refractory period effect indicate a stubborn bottleneck encompassing the process of choosing actions and probably memory retrieval generally, together with certain other cognitive operations. Other limitations associated with task preparation, sensory-perceptual processes, and timing can generate additional and distinct forms of interference. These conclusions challenge widely accepted ideas about attentional resources and probe reaction time methodologies. They also suggest new ways of thinking about continuous dual-task performance, effects of extraneous stimulation (e.g., stop signals), and automaticity. Implications for higher mental processes are discussed.


Keywords: Driver distraction;

Language: en