Citation

Antoniou G. History and Theory 2007; 46(4): 92-112.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-2303.2007.00430.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article examines the theoretical and methodological implications of the revisionist debates. It focuses on the political, academic, and moral dimensions of the process of rewriting history and its interrelation with the public sphere. The article examines the recent debate in Greece and compares it with case studies of Germany, Spain, Israel, the Soviet Union, and Ireland. It comments on the common elements of these cases and proposes a basic typology of the revisionist debates in terms of similarities and differences. It categorizes the revisionist endeavors into three types: the successful, the failed, and the bewildered.