SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Porath CL, Overbeck JR, Pearson CM. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2008; 38(7): 1945-1980.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00375.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

How do people respond to status challenges? We suggest that responses depend on the relative status and genders of challenger and target. These variables affect appraisals about the status challenge (operationally defined as an act of incivility) and likely outcomes of various responses, and those appraisals proximately determine responses. Studies 1 and 2 show that male gender and high status were associated with more aggressive responses, whereas female gender and low status were associated with more avoidant responses. Study 3 shows that men's and women's responses were not perfectly antithetical: Men showed the greatest resistance toward peers, which may reflect greater sensitivity to status contests among men. Perceived legitimacy of challengers' actions and consequences affect the status–gender–response relationships.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print