Citation

Sinclair SL. J. Fam. Ther. 2007; 29(2): 147-168.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-6427.2007.00378.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article seeks to re-engage a conversation regarding the importance of acknowledging the discursive content of the therapeutic process. Hare-Mustin's (1994) article argued that psychotherapy is involved in the generation of values and norms, and thus requires ethical sensibilities. Her analysis recognized how particular socio-cultural forces go unnoticed and suggested that unless therapists recognize their participation in discursive practices, they may unwittingly collude with and reinforce harmful cultural practices. The goal of this article is to revisit the ‘mirrored room’ so that family therapists can more deliberately evaluate their participation in cultural practices that impact on their work with clients. This article begins with a review of contemporary efforts to grapple with the issues Hare-Mustin presented, and maintains that even contemporary approaches that assert a commitment to postmodern understandings remain incomplete without an analysis of discourse. The article then outlines the conceptual tools within discursive practice that advance the initial motivation of these contemporary efforts.