SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Baletti B, Johnson TM, Wolford W. J. Agrar. Change 2008; 8(2‐3): 290-314.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00171.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the political dynamics of the contemporary ‘transnational peasant network’ through a comparison of two movements: the Brazilian Movimento Dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra (MST) and the South African Landless People's Movement (LPM). We argue that transnational visions of ‘peasants’ often obscure relations between or within rural movements. One tangible benefit of the transnational peasant network is the exchange of ideas, experiences and information, but this exchange does not happen in a vacuum, rather it happens in the historically-situated, power-laden context of an uneven world system. Organized in 1984, MST activists from Brazil helped to train, educate and inspire South African activists after the LPM formed in 2001, but key elements of the MST's success were inappropriate or unworkable in the South African context. Ultimately, the transfer of movement knowledge from the MST to the LPM may have worked against the long-term success of the latter.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print