Citation

Chang WR, Matz S. Appl. Ergon. 2001; 32(6): 549-558.

Affiliation

Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA. wen.chang@libertymutual.com

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11703041

Abstract

The slip resistance of 16 commonly used footwear materials was measured with the Brungraber Mark II and the English XL on 3 floor surfaces under surface conditions of dry, wet, oily and oily wet. Three samples were used for each material combination and surface condition. The results of a one way ANOVA analysis indicated that the differences among different samples were statistically significant for a large number of material combinations and surface conditions. The results indicated that the ranking of materials based on their slip resistance values depends highly on the slipmeters, floor surfaces and surface conditions. For contaminated surfaces including wet, oily and oily wet surfaces, the slip resistance obtained with the English XL was usually higher than that measured with the Brungraber Mark II. The correlation coefficients between the slip resistance obtained with these two slipmeters calculated for different surface conditions indicated a strong correlation with statistical significance.

Language: en