Citation

Chambers SA. New Polit. Sci. 2007; 29(1): 43-60.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/07393140601170792

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Today, both politicians and the media echo the refrain that the world has changed fundamentally since 9/11. This shift involves the tacit sense that the world is more violent, as 9/11 is conceived as an act of pure violence. This article works against the grain of such received wisdom, but not by trying to refute it empirically. Instead, the article articulates and elucidates the latent concept of “normative violence” lodged within the writings of Judith Butler. Normative violence names not a type of violence that is somehow “normative,” but the violence of norms. Further, normative violence should be understood as a primary form of violence, because it both facilitates typical, physical violence and simultaneously renders such violence invisible. The article puts the concept of normative violence to work for two purposes: it rereads the politics of Butler's Gender Trouble and it rethinks our notion of violence after 9/11. The article thereby makes a case for Butler's contribution to political theory while it seeks to make sense of our post-9/11 predicament.