Citation

Klusmeyer D. Int. Stud. Rev. 2009; 11(2): 332-351.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00851.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Hans Morgenthau claimed that a tragic perspective enables us to confront more squarely the harsh realities of politics, the evil aspects of human nature, and the ethical compromises action requires. Richard Lebow has more recently identified Morgenthau as an exemplar in making his own case for the “tragic vision.” This essay contrasts the sharp differences between Morgenthau’s and Hannah Arendt’s response to the Holocaust to challenge Morgenthau’s claim, and to illustrate the limitations of a tragic perspective. Her turn to law in confronting the problems of evil and responsibility that the Holocaust had so radically posed underscores the need to draw upon other conceptual resources beyond tragedy in our critical engagement with such issues.