Citation

Newman M. Polit. Q. 2009; 80(1): 92-100.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, Political Quarterly Publishing, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.01963.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The Declaration on ‘the responsibility to protect’ (R2P), unanimously endorsed by the Security Council in April 2006, identified both national and international responsibilities in relation to genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes and crimes against humanity. This was highly significant in appearing to accept that the prevention of mass atrocities was a legitimate international concern. Subsequently, there has been some disappointment about the limited practical impact of R2P, and also anxiety that its progress may be impeded by the fear that it is designed to legitimise military intervention. However, this article concentrates on a different concern. Arguing that an earlier version of R2P (in the International Commission on Intervention and Sovereignty of 2001) linked the issues with those of human security and development, it suggests that the contemporary focus is far narrower, undermining its critical potential with regard to the policies of the global North and reducing its appeal to developing countries.