Citation

Cameron JE, Nickerson SL. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2009; 39(3): 734-761.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00458.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Anti-globalization protest is analyzed as a function of ideological opposition to social hierarchy and identification with the social movement. Demonstrators (N = 145) at the Summit of the Americas in Québec City in April 2001 completed measures of social dominance orientation (SDO), social identification with the anti-globalization movement, and the likelihood of engaging in various protest behaviors. Results supported the hypothesis that social identification mediates the link between SDO and inclinations toward 2 forms of collective action (anti-globalization protest and indirect protest), whereas non-normative protest tended to be endorsed most strongly by male demonstrators. These relationships inform theoretical perspectives on politicized collective identity and the social psychology of social movement participation.