SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kontogiannis T. Safety Sci. 1999; 32(1): 49-68.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Safety science has long been dominated by the concept of error suppression or prevention. With the increasing complexity of man-machine systems, however, error recovery may seem an important supplementary safety goal since total error prevention may be difficult to achieve. This article presents an elaborate examination of the different processes of error recovery (i.e. detection, explanation, correction), the stages at which they might occur, and the types of recovery goals that users may set themselves. A research framework is proposed on the basis of a taxonomy of user strategies which could support error recovery. User strategies can range from information search strategies (i.e. inner feedback, system error cueing, communications) to planning behaviours and learning from errors. The research framework explores how error detection and correction may vary as a function of error types, recovery stages, and user strategies. The benefits of this framework are illustrated in the context of system design and training regimes which can enhance recovery from errors.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print