Citation

Gleaves DH, Hernandez E. Hist. Psychol. 1999; 2(4): 304-354.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Educational Publishing Foundation)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11624577

Abstract

It is well known that, as part of Freud's early work with "hysteria," he reported making discoveries of sexual abuse that he interpreted first as genuine but subsequently as fantasy. Several writers now argue that Freud never made such discoveries; rather that he lied about them, only inferred abuse from his patients' symptoms, or suggested false memories to his clients. The present authors evaluate Freud's original work and these recent claims and conclude that (a) they are not new and are similar to the original reaction that Freud received; (b) the assertion that Freud did not make discoveries of abuse is unwarranted; and (c) these recent writers frequently have supported their positions by misrepresenting what Freud actually wrote, ignoring evidence that contradicted their position, failing to consider obvious and more plausible explanations for Freud's behavior, and going beyond the available data and stating with certainty what cannot be determined.

Language: en