Citation

Barratt ES, Felthous AR. Behav. Sci. Law 2003; 21(5): 619-630.

Affiliation

Psychodiagnostic Service and Cognitive Neurosciences Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0189, USA. ebarratt@utmb.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/bsl.555

PMID

14502692

Abstract

Science can provide more information about the nature of aggressive acts, and therefore the mens rea of criminal offenses, than is commonly assumed. For example, progress has been made in classifying aggression as impulsive or premeditated within the context of the role of conscious experience in controlling behavior. This review of the status of the scientific ability to distinguish conscious from unconscious acts and more specifically impulsive from premeditated aggressive acts is organized around four themes: (i) How is aggression defined and measured in general? (ii) How does the distinction between impulsive and premeditated aggression relate to the legal concept of mens rea? (iii) How do various scientific disciplines contribute to the mind/body discourse? (iv) What risk factors are associated with impulsive and premeditated aggression respectively? The authors conclude that the most promising approach to researching the nature of behavioral intention and motivation is to apply a discipline neutral model that integrates the data from multiple disciplines, collectively designated the cognitive neurosciences.

Language: en