Citation

Chang WR, Gronqvist R, Leclercq S, Brungraber RJ, Mattke U, Strandberg L, Thorpe SC, Myung R, Makkonen L, Courtney TK. Ergonomics 2001; 44(13): 1233-1261.

Affiliation

Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA. Wen.Chang@LibertyMutual.com

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11794766

Abstract

This paper seeks to address questions related to friction measurement such as how friction is related to human-centred assessment and actual slipping, and how repeatable friction measurements are. Commonly used devices for slipperiness measurement are surveyed and their characteristics compared with suggested test conditions from biomechanical observations summarized in Part 1. The issues of device validity, repeatability, reproducibility and usability are examined from the published literature. Friction assessment using the mechanical measurement devices described appears generally valid and reliable. However, the validity of most devices could be improved by bringing them within the range of human slipping conditions observed in biomechanical studies. Future studies should clearly describe the performance limitations of any device and its results and should consider whether the device conditions reflect these actual human slipping conditions. There is also a need for validation studies of more devices by walking experiments.

Language: en