Citation

Brodsky SL, Heller P. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 2008; 36(4): 541-543.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0348, USA. sbrodsky@bama.ua.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Publisher American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

19092073

Abstract

When expert witnesses are cross-examined, a common gambit of opposing counsel is to create a phantom for comparison purposes. The constructed phantom is typically portrayed as an individual who has gone through similar, difficult life circumstances without the impairments or problematic behavioral sequelae of the plaintiff or defendant in the trial. Abuse histories, assaults, and traumatic experiences all are posited to have little effect on this phantom other, an invulnerability that leads us to call this construct the Perfect Phantom. In this article, the nature of the Perfect Phantom cross-examination is described, along with strategies for coping with these questions.

Language: en