Citation

Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Shlien-Dellinger RK, Huss MT, Kramer VL. J. Interpers. Violence 2004; 19(4): 484-498.

Affiliation

Psychology Department, University of South Alabama, Mobile 36688, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0886260503262084

PMID

15038886

Abstract

This analogue study (written vignettes and videotapes) examines the influence of victim-perpetrator relationship (spouse or acquaintance), sex of perceiver, and type of abuse (psychological vs. physical) on attributions about victims and perpetrators of domestic abuse. College student participants (73 men, 108 women) were randomly assigned to condition. As expected, type of relationship influenced observer perceptions. Specifically, participants rated the victim of marital violence as more psychologically damaged and disturbed by the abuse than the victim of acquaintance violence. Furthermore, interaction effects showed that men, more than women, rated the actions of the married perpetrator as more of a victim's rights violation than the actions of the acquaintance perpetrator. Second, type of abuse was shown to influence perceptions of the perpetrator but not the victim. Sex-of-perceiver effects were also obtained. Women held the perpetrator more responsible and assigned less blame to the victim than did men. Legal and clinical implications are then discussed.

Language: en