Citation

Pezdek K, Morrow A, Blandon-Gitlin I, Goodman GS, Quas JA, Saywitz KJ, Bidrose S, Pipe ME, Rogers M, Brodie L. J. Appl. Psychol. 2004; 89(1): 119-126.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, School of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711-3955, USA. kathy.pezdek@cgu.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.119

PMID

14769124

Abstract

Statement Validity Assessment (SVA) is a comprehensive credibility assessment system, with the Criterion-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) as a core component. Worldwide, the CBCA is reported to be the most widely used veracity assessment instrument. We tested and confirmed the hypothesis that CBCA scores are affected by event familiarity; descriptions of familiar events are more likely to be judged true than are descriptions of unfamiliar events. CBCA scores were applied to transcripts of 114 children who recalled a routine medical procedure (control) or a traumatic medical procedure that they had experienced one time (relatively unfamiliar) or multiple times (relatively familiar). CBCA scores were higher for children in the relatively familiar than the relatively unfamiliar condition, and CBCA scores were significantly correlated with age. Results raise serious questions regarding the forensic suitability of the CBCA for assessing the veracity of children's accounts.

Language: en