SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Williams ACC, Rajput-Ray M, Lassalle X, Crombie IK, Lacoux P. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 2011; 42(2): 301-307.

Affiliation

Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology (A.C.d.C.W.), University College London, London; Addenbrooke's Hospital (M.R.-R.), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Department of Public Health (I.C.), University of Dundee Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom; Department of Anesthesia (P.L.), Technical Advisor for Anaesthesia, MSF (X.L.), Paris, France.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.11.012

PMID

21444187

Abstract

CONTEXT: Accurate pain assessment is important but presents problems in poorly resourced countries. A civil war in Sierra Leone resulted in civilian casualties with pain from deliberate amputation and other injuries. OBJECTIVE: To examine the quality of simple pain and mood scales. METHODS: Within a pain treatment project, pain was assessed using numerical and verbal descriptor scales and mood using visual analog scale (VAS) and verbal descriptor scale. The relationships between these scales (translated where necessary) were examined by comparison of pairs of measures. RESULTS: The overwhelming majority (99%) used the scales consistently. The verbal pain scale showed substantial discrimination between the pain words mild/small, moderate/half and half, and severe/serious (F=41.80, P<0.001). Numerical and verbal pain scales were related at a modest level (Kendall's tau-b=0.39, P<0.001, n=272) and not dependent on the level of education. A smaller sample (n=30) provided pain data across three assessment occasions, and both pain scales appeared sensitive to change. The five-point verbal mood scale collapsed into three categories, with reasonable distinction between mood words (F=14.75, P<0.001). The VAS proved difficult to explain to civilian casualties in this setting. CONCLUSION: Verbal pain and mood scales and numerical pain scales appeared to yield useful information in a postconflict situation. This suggests that adapting these established rating scales for pain, and for mood, was useful to clinicians and acceptable to patients.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print