Citation

Fussell H, Haaken J, Lewy CS, McFarland BH. Psychiatry 2009; 72(4): 382-392.

Affiliation

Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon, USA. fussellh@ohsu.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, Guilford Publications)

DOI

10.1521/psyc.2009.72.4.382

PMID

20070136

Abstract

This study draws on theory by Solomon Asch (1946, 1952) to examine how presenting with intimate partner violence versus methamphetamine use shapes characteristics of substance abuse assessment interviews. When responding to an initial open-ended question from a substance abuse counselor, the methamphetamine user and intimate partner violence survivor may elicit very different reactions from the counselor. We predicted that these differing presenting problems would initiate different trajectories for overall impression formation. To test this hypothesis, 18 substance abuse practitioners interviewed one standardized patient (an actor portraying a substance abuse client) who alternated her presenting problem between a) violence in a domestic setting and b) methamphetamine use. The remainder of her story was identical for counselors in either presenting problem group. Results included differences between the two groups in median length of the interviews and failure of both groups to explore domestic violence as a cooccurring problem. Clinical practices related to substance abuse counseling and intimate partner violence are discussed in light of these findings.

Language: en