SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Berth H, Balck F, Brahler E. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol. 2005; 55(12): 493-501.

Vernacular Title

Sprachinhaltsanalyse in der kulturvergleichenden psychosomatischen Forschung. Die

Affiliation

Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie. berth@inhaltsanalyse.de

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Georg Thieme Verlag)

DOI

10.1055/s-2005-915267

PMID

16342022

Abstract

The Gottschalk-Gleser-analysis, a content-analytical technique, measures anxious and aggressive affects. For decades this technique was primarily and widely implemented in psychosomatic research. Today, this technique is offered in numerous languages. Since this technique is time consuming in application and analysis, computer software has been developed for English (Psychiatric Content Analysis and Diagnosis, PCAD 2000) as well as for German contents (Dresdner Angstwörterbuch, DAW). This study compares the anxiety scale of both versions in order to evaluate their comparability in cross-cultural psychosomatic studies. The English and German version of 96 different abstracts of the German Journal for Psychotherapy, Psychosomatic Medicine and Medicine Psychology from 2003 and 2004 with a total of 31 000 words were compared. The scores of the Gottschalk-Gleser anxiety scales of both computer programs correlates between 0.21 and 0.59 (p < 0.05, only exception: shame anxiety). The means of the scores calculated by the PCAD and DAW significantly differ for all scales. Therefore, these two content analytical methods DAW and PCAD provide only limited use for cross-cultural comparisons in psychosomatic research.


Language: de

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print