SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Mimran S, Rotem R. Insight 2005; 30(3): 10-12.

Affiliation

Hadassah University Hospital, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel. Sheila@hadassah.org.il

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses, Publisher Mosby)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

16350355

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and severity of penetrating eye trauma (PET) in victims of terror attacks in Jerusalem and to determine their specific in-hospital needs; and to evaluate the role of the ophthalmic nurse in helping to treat these patients in wards other than the ophthalmology ward and to determine how the ophthalmic nurse can coordinate care of the patients with other hospital personnel. BACKGROUND: PET is a common cause of significant visual loss. Early treatment is mandatory if maximum vision is to be restored. From January 2000 through February 2003, 468 victims of terror were examined in one of two major hospitals in Jerusalem that treat ocular injuries; 40 (8.5%) of these patients suffered from PET. METHODS: We conducted in our hospital a retrospective chart review of 109 consecutive patients with PET from January 2000 to February 2003; 40 (36.7%) cases were caused by terrorism. Data were collected on demographic characteristics; type, cause and extent of injury; and visual acuity (VA) on admission and at discharge. The terror victims were hospitalized in intensive care, surgical, and ophthalmology wards. RESULTS: Of the patients admitted after terrorist attacks, 64% were male. Arab patients comprised 20% of those admitted. Ninety-five percent of the terror victims with PET required surgery (20% for enucleation, 30% for retinal detachment, and the remaining 45% for other causes). Eighty-two percent of these victims presented with a visual acuity > or = 20/200 in the injured eye (versus 63% in patients admitted with ocular trauma from other causes), and 44% remained blind at discharge (versus 28% from other causes). CONCLUSIONS: Terror victims have more severe ocular injuries than do other patients with PET Ophthalmic nurses must make a special effort to attend to these patients in wards other than the ophthalmology wards and to coordinate their in-hospital care and follow-up treatments with hospital personnel in intensive care and surgical wards.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print