Citation

Han ZY, Weng WG. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011; 189(1-2): 509-518.

Affiliation

Center for Public Safety Research, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.067

PMID

21402442

Abstract

In this paper, a qualitative and a quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network are proposed. The qualitative method is comprised of an index system, which includes a causation index, an inherent risk index, a consequence index and their corresponding weights. The quantitative method consists of a probability assessment, a consequences analysis and a risk evaluation. The outcome of the qualitative method is a qualitative risk value, and for quantitative method the outcomes are individual risk and social risk. In comparison with previous research, the qualitative method proposed in this paper is particularly suitable for urban natural gas pipeline network, and the quantitative method takes different consequences of accidents into consideration, such as toxic gas diffusion, jet flame, fire ball combustion and UVCE. Two sample urban natural gas pipeline networks are used to demonstrate these two methods. It is indicated that both of the two methods can be applied to practical application, and the choice of the methods depends on the actual basic data of the gas pipelines and the precision requirements of risk assessment.

Keywords: Pipeline transportation

Language: en