SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Guilcher SJ, Munce SEP, Couris CM, Fung K, Craven BC, Verrier M, Jaglal SB. Spinal Cord 2010; 48(1): 45-50.

Affiliation

Department of Health, Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, International Spinal Cord Society, Publisher Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1038/sc.2009.78

PMID

19546877

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort design. OBJECTIVES: To compare socio-demographic, impairment characteristics and utilization (physician and emergency department (ED) visits) for non-traumatic (NTSCI) and traumatic (TSCI) spinal cord injury 1 year post inpatient rehabilitation. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Inpatient stays (2003-2006) were identified from the National Rehabilitation Registry System. Exclusions were: in-hospital mortality; discharge after 31 March 2006; death within 1 year after discharge. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors predicting high utilization. RESULTS: NTSCI cases (n=1002) were greater than TSCI (n=560). NTSCIs were older (mean=61.6, s.d.=15.8) with more co-morbidities, paraplegic (39.5%) and female (P<0.001). NTSCI had higher FIM admission and discharge scores but lower change scores. Mean number of physician visits for NTSCI and TSCI were 31.2 (median=24) and 29.7 (median=22), with no significant differences in mean specialist visits (NTSCI 16.5: TSCI 17.0). Factors predicting 30 or more physician visits included age 60 years or above (OR=1.5; 95% CI=1.2-1.9), urban living (OR=1.59; 95% CI=1.12-2.22) and lowest quartile (18-88) discharge FIM (OR=1.8; 95% CI=1.4-2.3). Charlson score of 3 or more (OR=2.1; 95% CI=1.3-3.2), urban living (OR=1.92; 95% CI=1.3-2.86) and lowest quartile discharge FIM (OR=1.5; 95% CI=1.2-2.0) were associated with 20 or more specialist visits. Factors for high ED use were: rurality (OR=1.5; 95% CI=1.1-2.1), low income (OR=1.4; 95% CI=1.1-1.9) and low (18-88) discharge FIM (OR=1.7; 95% CI=1.3-2.2). CONCLUSION: Both demonstrated significant health care utilization requiring attention to health care needs; particularly for those living in rural settings, with low income and/or low functional ability.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print