Citation

Smith MR, Walker A, Brenchley J. Emerg. Med. J. 2003; 20(3): 253-255.

Affiliation

Emergency Department, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12748142

PMCID

PMC1726116

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Several trials have been published examining the role of antibiotics in dog bite wound management. A meta-analysis of these suggests that there is very little benefit to routine antibiotic prescription in these patients. All papers however incorporated rigorous wound care regimens involving large volume irrigation. METHODS: The authors undertook a telephone survey to investigate wound care and prescribing practice in bite wound management in accident and emergency and minor injury units in the Yorkshire region. RESULTS: Twenty one departments were contacted. Only 10% of departments routinely irrigate these wounds. Antibiotics are prescribed routinely in 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Management of dog bite wounds would not seem to be evidence based in most departments in this sample.

Language: en