Citation

Shin H, Tepas JJ, Ismail N, Mollitt DL, DiScala C, Koeppel B. Am. Surg. 1997; 63(1): 29-36.

Affiliation

Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville 32209, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, Southeastern Surgical Congress)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8985068

Abstract

This analysis of mortality from blunt hepatic injury was performed to define outcome in the adolescent age group in relation to that recorded for children and adults. Children (age 0-10 years) were selected from a multi-institutional trauma registry, adults (age > or = 21 years) from the registry of a Level I trauma center, and adolescents (age 11-20 years) from both. Groups were compared by injury frequency, proportion of severe hepatic injuries (code 864.03 or 864.04 in the International Classification of Diseases, Adapted for Use in the United States 9-CM), immediate laparotomy, mortality, and cause of death. Children had the lowest proportion of severe injury and overall mortality. Torso trauma was the primary cause of death in only three children. Adolescent injury patterns were similar to those of adults in the proportion of severe visceral disruption and incidence of fatal torso trauma. Immediate laparotomy was employed almost twice as commonly in adults as in adolescents. The 64 per cent of adolescents who did not undergo laparotomy had a lower mortality than those who did. Conversely, the 36 per cent of adults without exploration had a significantly higher mortality, which usually occurred before laparotomy could be initiated. Increasing hepatic injury severity brought increasing mortality; however, the cause of death differed with age. Although the incidence of severe liver injury did not differ between adolescents and adults, management and outcome did. These data indicate that individualized management based on overall patient status remains the best approach to care of these injuries.

Language: en