Citation

de Burgh S, Berry G. Addiction 1997; 92(6): 667-672.

Affiliation

University of Western Sydney-Macarthur.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

9246795

Abstract

In quantity-frequency methods used for self-report measurement of alcohol intake (or other exposures), respondents mark the appropriate ranges, e.g. '5 to 8 drinks', '5 or 6 times per week'. To calculate average consumption only single values, not ranges, can be multiplied, and midpoints are commonly used. This results in bias if the range lies in the tail of a distribution, as often happens with drinks per occasion. The same bias occurs when risk, for example, is plotted against consumption levels, which inevitable are grouped into ranges. Consequently, estimates of aggregate consumption can be exaggerated and curves of risk against exposure level can be misleading. A method is described to calculate a relatively unbiased representative value for a range, requiring only knowledge of the normal distribution table, the log-normal distribution, and basic arithmetic. Part of the procedure is also useful for estimating percentile points in data that have been grouped differently, such as income in dollar groups.

Language: en