Citation

O'Neill T, Papapoulos S. Baillieres Clin. Rheumatol. 1997; 11(3): 565-582.

Affiliation

ARC Epidemiology Research Unit, Manchester University, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, Baillière Tindall)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

9367037

Abstract

The primary aim of any intervention in osteoporosis is the prevention of fractures in individuals who have not yet fractured or the prevention of the progression of the disease in individuals with fragility fractures. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend either a population-based prevention strategy or a strategy based on general screening with treatment of those individuals identified at high risk. Identification of subjects with strong clinical risk factors for osteoporotic fractures with subsequent measurement or not of bone mineral density as well as those with fragility fractures constitute at present the most rational approach to fracture prevention. Current measures to prevent osteoporotic fractures aim mainly at influencing bone mass and bone turnover and reducing the risk and impact of falls. Interventions that can reduce effectively the frequency of osteoporotic fractures in subjects at risk are available and new or alternative interventions are being developed. Issues related to the impact of these interventions on public health and health economics need to be addressed and methods to calculate the clinical outcomes in a way allowing comparison with outcomes of interventions in other common diseases should be developed.

Language: en