CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
McEwan TE, Pathé M, Ogloff JRP. Behav. Sci. Law 2011; 29(2): 180-201. |
|
Affiliation |
Paul Mullen Centre, 505 Hoddle St, Clifton Hill VIC, Australia 3068.. troy.mcewan@monash.edu. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2011, John Wiley and Sons) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
21328474 |
|
Abstract |
Over the past 15 years, forensic mental health has become more concerned with the concepts of violence prevention, management, and treatment. The development of specialist tools to aid in the assessment of a range of risks reflects this concern. This article explores contemporary thinking on violence risk assessment and how this knowledge can be applied to the relatively newer field of stalking risk assessment. The role of risk state and risk status are discussed, in addition to the way that standard structured professional judgment procedures need to be adapted to reflect the variety of risks present in stalking situations. The authors go on to describe the development and format of the Stalking Risk Profile, a set of structured professional judgment guidelines for assessing risk in stalkers. Suggestions are made for future research to enhance knowledge and improve practice in the field of stalking risk assessment. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Language: en |