Citation

Takizawa S, Sugimoto T, Suzuki H. Proc. Int. Tech. Conf. Enhanced Safety Vehicles 2003; 2003: 13 p..

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, In public domain, Publisher National Highway Traffic Safety Administration)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine compatibility test procedures proposed in the IHRA Vehicle Compatibility Working Group. Various crash tests were conducted with different vehicle weights and stiffness in our previous study, and each of the compatibility problems, namely mass, stiffness and geometric incompatibility were identified in these tests. In order to improve the compatibility, it is necessary to evaluate and control relevant vehicle characteristics of compatibility in test procedures. According to the IHRA study, relevant aspects for compatibility in frontal impact include: good structural interaction; frontal stiffness matching; maintaining passenger compartment integrity; and control of the deceleration time histories of impacting cars. Possible candidate test procedures to evaluate four items are outlined. A full width Load Cell Barrier test in which the load cell data was analyzed to evaluate structural interaction of vehicles, and some geometric indices such as Average Height Of Force, interaction area, and stiffness indices were carried out. It was found from the analysis that several candidate metrics could be identified given their high correlation with laboratory vehicle-to-vehicle crash tests. An MDB (moving deformable barrier)-to-vehicle test, which allows the mass ratio to be taken directly into account, was undertaken. Potentially it can generate a realistic delta V and vehicle acceleration pulse. It has been recognized that the MDB could be used as a representative of an actual vehicle, and it provides more flexibility in compatibility test procedures. MDB-to-vehicle tests were conducted to confirm the reproducibility of vehicle-to-vehicle tests; the test results and analysis are reported in this paper.