Citation

James TE, Jorgensen PD. Policy Stud. J. 2009; 37(1): 141-162.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, Policy Studies Organization (USA), Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00300.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Understanding the influence of policy knowledge (analysis, evaluation) on policy change represents a long‐standing quest in the policy sciences. Despite attempts of Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) scholars, the first to embark systematically on this quest, utilization and policy process literatures still run parallel. Through a critique of ACF and utilization studies, we argue that the inability of policy theory to include how and which information decision makers use is the foundational issue hindering efforts to link process and substance in policy theory. Situating utilization studies in the policy design approach offers an improvement in conceptualizing relationships between policy knowledge, process, and change.