Citation

Horn K, Leontieva L, Williams JM, Furbee PM, Helmkamp JC, Manley WG. J. Crit. Care 2002; 17(4): 212-220.

Affiliation

Department of Community Medicine, Center for Rural Emergency Medicine, Office of Drug Abuse Intervention Studies, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA. khorn@wvu.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1053/jcrc.2002.37231

PMID

12501148

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study aims were to explore the process of identifying young adult Emergency Department (ED) patients at risk for alcohol problems, examine the sociodemographic predictors of patient alcohol problems, and determine differences between patients who screened positive and those who screened negative for alcohol problems. Implications for ED practice are discussed. METHOD: As part of a larger study, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test was administered to consenting patients ages 18 to 29. A score of greater than 5 (out of 40) was considered a positive screen for alcohol problems. Sociodemographic information was collected from a generic Individual Information Form. RESULTS: Approximately 48% (1855 of 3890) of patients screened positive for alcohol problems. Among screen-positive patients, 91% (1689) had scores that corresponded to mild to moderate alcohol problems. Compared with screen-negative patients, screen-positive patients were almost 3 times more likely to be men (odds ratio [OR] = 2.70); 2.5 times more likely to use tobacco (OR = 2.43); 2 times more likely to be single (OR = 2.03); and 1.5 times more likely to have some college education (OR = 1.41), be an 18- to 20-year-old adult (OR = 1.61), be a college student (OR = 1.60), be unemployed (OR = 1.39), and cohabitate with friends (OR = 1.19). Screen-positive patients also were more likely to have made at least one past attempt to change their drinking behavior (OR = 3.21). CONCLUSION: Routine patient information presented an accurate risk profile for alcohol problems among patients in this study. If ED-based health care professionals routinely screened patients for alcohol problems or could predict potential alcohol problems by using routinely collected information, then intervention or referral for additional services may increase.