Citation

MacLeod AK, Tarbuck AF. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 1994; 33(Pt 3): 317-326.

Affiliation

Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Surrey, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1994, British Psychological Society)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

7994217

Abstract

Parasuicides (N = 18) were compared with matched controls (N = 18) on their subjective probability judgements for nine future, negative, self-relevant events. Prior to the probability judgements, subjects were asked to think of reasons why the events would or would not happen. The ease with which they were able to think of reasons was assessed by time taken to think of the first reason, number of different reasons given in 90 seconds and a subjective rating of difficulty. Relative to controls, parasuicides judged negative events to be more likely. They also showed evidence of finding it more difficult to think of why those events might not happen, but were no different from controls in their ability to think of reasons why the events would happen. The effect of thinking of reasons against negative events happening was to reduce the pessimism of parasuicides. It is suggested that parasuicide subjects may not actively anticipate future negative outcomes, but when presented with the possibilities, they judge them to be likely because of an inability to think of positive aspects of themselves or their circumstances which would prevent those events happening.

Language: en