SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bull JP, Roberts BJ. Accid. Anal. Prev. 1973; 5(1): 45-53.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1973, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Studies in Sweden have raised doubts as to the accuracy of road accident statistics in relation to serious and slight injuries. To explore the reliability of British statistics an analysis has been made of a sample of 1200 patients injured in road accidents and attending hospital. These same cases have been traced in the police records on which official statistics are based. All fatal cases were correctly notified but two types of discrepancy occurred among injuries. In a small number of cases re-classification of "serious" and "slight" seemed to be required. A more important discrepancy was that about one-sixth of serious injuries and one third of slight injuries known to the hospital did not appear in the police notifications. This is not surprising in view of the limited scope of compulsory notification. The police mostly know of accidents by the calling of an ambulance or as a result of allegations of traffic infringements. Thus many cases where an ambulance is not called or in which a driver only is injured and no other vehicle is involved, escape notification. Injuries to pedal cyclists are particularly poorly notified. Less than one quarter of those known to the hospital appeared in the official statistics. It is concluded that similar comparisons of hospital and police information should be made elsewhere to confirm whether this sample is representative of the national rate of notification. In the meantime it is suggested that figures for injuries to pedal cyclists and for slight injuries in general should be used with caution.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print