Citation

Ghetti S, Redlich AD. Behav. Sci. Law 2001; 19(1): 33-52.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, One Shields Avenue, University of California at Davis, Davis CA 95616-8686, USA. sghetti@ucdavis.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/bsl.426

PMID

11241680

Abstract

Recent changes in juvenile justice policies have stimulated debate among legal professionals and social scientists. As such, public opinion concerning juvenile offenders is an important and timely topic for empirical study. In the present study, respondents read a scenario about a juvenile who committed a crime, and then decided on a sentence and rated perceptions of the juvenile's accountability and legal competence. Four between-subject factors were manipulated: age of the defendant (11 versus 14 versus 17 years), type of crime (shooting versus arson), crime outcome (victim injured versus died), and time delay between the instigating incident and the crime (immediately versus one day). The type and outcome of the crime were major motivating factors in sentencing decisions and perceptions of legal competence, and, although younger offenders were seen as less accountable and less competent than older offenders, sentence allocation and attitudes towards punishment were not significantly affected by offender age.

Language: en