Citation

Rosati AG, Hare B. Biol. Lett. 2011; 7(1): 15-18.

Affiliation

Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, , Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Royal Society Publishing)

DOI

10.1098/rsbl.2010.0927

PMID

21106573

PMCID

PMC3030905

Abstract

Although recent research has investigated animal decision-making under risk, little is known about how animals choose under conditions of ambiguity when they lack information about the available alternatives. Many models of choice behaviour assume that ambiguity does not impact decision-makers, but studies of humans suggest that people tend to be more averse to choosing ambiguous options than risky options with known probabilities. To illuminate the evolutionary roots of human economic behaviour, we examined whether our closest living relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), share this bias against ambiguity. Apes chose between a certain option that reliably provided an intermediately preferred food type, and a variable option that could vary in the probability that it provided a highly preferred food type. To examine the impact of ambiguity on ape decision-making, we interspersed trials in which chimpanzees and bonobos had no knowledge about the probabilities. Both species avoided the ambiguous option compared with their choices for a risky option, indicating that ambiguity aversion is shared by humans, bonobos and chimpanzees.

Language: en