SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Chin YS, Jayamohan J, Clouston P, Gebski V, Cakir B. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2004; 11(5): 471-474.

Affiliation

Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Wentworthville, NSW 2145, Australia. yawie@radonc.wsahs.nsw.gov.au

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jocn.2003.08.010

PMID

15177385

Abstract

This study was aimed at evaluating the consistency of driving advice given by treating clinicians to patients diagnosed with brain tumours. Secondary aims include assessing the awareness of current driving guidelines and whether or not there was a need for more specific guidelines in this group of patients. This was undertaken utilizing a scenario-based postal survey. The results show an overall poor consistency in the answers provided for each case scenario. 73.1% respondents were not aware of any current driving guidelines. Of those who were aware of driving guidelines, 67.7% wanted more specific guidelines to be developed. Possible explanations for this are a lack of awareness of the existence of any driving guidelines and a lack of objective criteria in the current driving guidelines. The authors recommend that the current driving guidelines be comprehensively distributed to clinicians who treat patients with brain tumours, as well as forming a multi-disciplinary working party to develop more specific and objective driving guidelines.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print