Citation

Grommet EK, Hemmes NS, Brown BL. Behav. Processes 2011; 86(1): 88-93.

Affiliation

Queens College and the Graduate Center, CUNY, Sylvie Droit-Volet and Sadrine Gil, Blaise Pascal University, CNRS, France.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.beproc.2010.10.003

PMID

20971168

Abstract

Previous research suggests that time judgments are a function of the affective properties of to-be-timed stimuli and that time judgments are longer for stimuli that are fear-inducing (e.g., Hare, 1963; Watts & Sharrock, 1983). The goals of the present study were twofold: to replicate the effect of a fear cue on time estimation, and to evaluate the mechanism underlying the effect. Seven stimulus durations in two different duration ranges (short: 250-1000ms; long: 400-1600ms) were employed in the bisection procedure. Adult human participants were exposed to two successive sessions, one each with the short and long range. Images from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS; Lang et al., 2008) that were rated on three scales including arousal and fear were presented as temporal stimuli. Three images that were rated high on fear and three rated low served as fear cues and neutral control images, respectively. Results indicated that for both ranges, judgments were longer for fear cues than for neutral images, and that the magnitude of the effect did not differ between ranges as measured by the bisection point. Application of scalar expectancy theory (SET; Gibbon, 1977; Church, 1984) to these results suggests that the fear effects were mediated by switch latency of an internal clock, rather than by clock speed.

Language: en